[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The RFC Editor's current position on Mohsen Banan's EMSD





Bob,

Thank you for forwarding those notes to me.

Thank you very much for your decision to publish EMSD.



A few minor comments related to your observations are included below.

>>>>> On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 10:07:09 -0800, braden@ISI.EDU said:

  braden> 		...

  braden> 		If true and if EMSD became widely used, this could be a
  braden> 		serious issue.  Perhaps Banan could be persuaded to
  braden> 		prepare a document specifying the mapping between the
  braden> 		two mail systems.

Persuading Banan of this is going to be quite easy.

Appendix D of the spec. titled "FURTHER DEVELOPMENT" includes that
already.


  braden> 		...

  braden> 		In particular, the title of the document was presented
  braden> 		to us as: "Neda's ...".  We believe that having a
  braden> 		company name in the title in this way is completely
  braden> 		inappropriate.  We will ask Banan to remove "Neda's" from
  braden> 		the title before publication.

I have absolutely no problem with that.

Please go ahead and remove "Neda's" from the title.


  braden> ...

  braden> We will await your decision on an IESG paragraph before publishing
  braden> this document.

Please allow me to review the IESG paragraph and express my opinion on
that before publication. I will respond promptly and make sure that 
my review of the IESG paragraph does not delay the publication.


Again, thank you.

Regards,

...Mohsen.


Replies
The RFC Editor's current position on Mohsen Banan's EMSD, braden
The RFC Editor's current position on Mohsen Banan's EMSD, braden
Main Index | Thread Index