Next: Bibliography
Up: Informational RFC-2524 M. Banan
Previous: RATIONALE FOR KEY DESIGN
Beyond this documentation of existing implementations,
further development of EMSD protocol is anticipated.
The following deficiencies and areas of improvement are identified.
- Mapping of RFC-822 to EMSD-FS needs to be more explicit.
- Mapping of EMSD-FS to RFC-822 needs to be more explicit.
- Text of duplicate detection section needs more structure.
- SubmissionControl operation needs more informative description.
- Based on implementor's feedback the "EMSD PROCEDURE FOR OPERATIONS"
section needs to be adjusted or re-done.
- The EMSD protocol can be extended to also support transfer of raw
RFC-822 text-based messages in addition to EMSD-FS.
This would be a trade-off in favor of "ease of implementation" against
"efficiency of bytes transfered".
- Provide mechanisms to support fully automated initial provisioning of
mail-boxes.
Future development of the EMSD Protocol is anticipated to take place
at http://www.emsd.org/. Those interested in further development and
maintenance of this protocol are invited to join the various mailing
lists hosted at http://www.emsd.org/.